Your search
Results 6 resources
-
This article reports the results of a meta-analysis of technology-based intervention studies for children with autism spectrum disorders. We conducted a systematic review of research that used a pre–post design to assess innovative technology interventions, including computer programs, virtual reality, and robotics. The selected studies provided interventions via a desktop computer, interactive DVD, shared active surface, and virtual reality. None employed robotics. The results provide...
-
Giving a student control over their learning has theoretical and intuitive appeal, but its effects are neither powerful nor consistent in the empirical literature base. This meta-analysis updated previous meta-analytic research by Niemiec, Sikorski, and Walberg by studying the overall effectiveness of providing learner control within educational technology, the characteristics of instruction along the continuum of learner control, and elements of the instructional environments that may play...
-
A systematic search of the research literature from 1996 through July 2008 identified more than a thousand empirical studies of online learning. Analysts screened these studies to find those that (a) contrasted an online to a face-to-face condition, (b) measured student learning outcomes, (c) used a rigorous research design, and (d) provided adequate information to calculate an effect size. As a result of this screening, 50 independent effects were identified that could be subjected to...
-
A meta-analysis was performed to synthesize existing research comparing the effects of computerassisted instruction (CAI) versus traditional instruction (TI) on studentsÕ achievement in Taiwan. Fiftytwo studies were located from our sources, and their quantitative data was transformed into effect size (ES). The overall grand mean of the study-weighted ES for all 52 studies was 0.55. The results suggest that CAI is more effective than TI in Taiwan. In addition, two of the seventeen variables...
Explore
Outcome measure
- Behaviour (2)
- Learning (6)
- Socio-emotional learning (1)
Instructional domain (subject)
- Literacy (1)
- Mathematics (1)
- Multiple (3)
- Science (1)
Education Level and Type
- ECE 0-7 (1)
- Informal education (2)
- K-12 (5)
- Secondary 11-16 (1)
- Tertiary
Groups of students
- SEND (1)
School or home
- _No mention (1)
- Mixture (1)
- School (2)
Moderating variables
- Design-type/ testing instruments (4)
- Grade/education level (2)
- IQ (1)
- Length of time
- Peer involvement/group learning (1)
- School-level factors (1)
- Subject (1)
- Teacher involvement (1)
- Teacher pedagogy/implementation (1)
- Type of instruction methods (student/teacher centered) (1)
- Type of knowledge or task (exposing, procedural, active, etc (1)
Tech Hardware
- CD ROM/ DVD (1)
- Computer (5)
- Internet (1)
Tech Software
Tech mechanism
Learning Approach
- Blended learning (3)
- Classroom learning (3)
- Remote learning (3)
Teacher Pedagogy
- _No mention (2)
- Scaffolding (1)
- Self-paced (no teacher) (1)
Research methods
Effect size/ heterogeneity
HIC/LMIC
- LMIC (middle/low) (1)
- Mixture or unknown (5)
Quality of research
- High: 6+ (4)
- Medium: 4 or above (2)
Geography if specific
- Taiwan (1)