Your search
Results 12 resources
-
This research aims to investigate the effect of computer-based teaching (CBT) on students’ academic success. The research used a meta-analytic method to reach a general conclusion by statistically calculating the results of a number of independent studies. In total, 78 studies (62 master’s theses, 4 PhD theses, and 12 articles) concerning this issue were researched based on the literature review of the articles and theses which involved pre-test and post-test control groups and were...
-
In this meta-analysis, we systematically reviewed research on digital games and learning for K–16 students. We synthesized comparisons of game versus nongame conditions (i.e., media comparisons) and comparisons of augmented games versus standard game designs (i.e., value-added comparisons). We used random-effects meta-regression models with robust variance estimates to summarize overall effects and explore potential moderator effects. Results from media comparisons indicated that digital...
-
There is no questioning that the way people live, interact, communicate, and conduct business is undergoing a profound, rapid change. This change is often referred to as the “digital revolution,” which is the advancement of technology from analog, electronic and mechanical tools to the digital tools available today. Moreover, technology has begun to change education, affecting how students acquire the skill sets needed to prepare for college and a career and how educators integrate digital...
-
In this meta-analysis, we investigated the effects of methods for providing item-based feedback in a computer-based environment on students’ learning outcomes. From 40 studies, 70 effect sizes were computed, which ranged from −0.78 to 2.29. A mixed model was used for the data analysis. The results show that elaborated feedback (EF; e.g., providing an explanation) produced larger effect sizes (0.49) than feedback regarding the correctness of the answer (KR; 0.05) or providing the correct...
-
The purpose of this meta-analysis is to examine overall effect as well as the impact of selected instructional design principles in the context of virtual reality technology-based instruction (i.e. games, simulation, virtual worlds) in K-12 or higher education settings. A total of 13 studies (N ¼ 3081) in the category of games, 29 studies (N ¼ 2553) in the category of games, and 27 studies (N ¼ 2798) in the category of virtual worlds were meta-analyzed. The key inclusion criteria were that...
-
A systematic search of the research literature from 1996 through July 2008 identified more than a thousand empirical studies of online learning. Analysts screened these studies to find those that (a) contrasted an online to a face-to-face condition, (b) measured student learning outcomes, (c) used a rigorous research design, and (d) provided adequate information to calculate an effect size. As a result of this screening, 50 independent effects were identified that could be subjected to...
-
A meta-analysis was performed to synthesize existing research comparing the effects of computerassisted instruction (CAI) versus traditional instruction (TI) on studentsÕ achievement in Taiwan. Fiftytwo studies were located from our sources, and their quantitative data was transformed into effect size (ES). The overall grand mean of the study-weighted ES for all 52 studies was 0.55. The results suggest that CAI is more effective than TI in Taiwan. In addition, two of the seventeen variables...
-
Substantial disagreement exists in the literature regarding which educational technology results in the highest cognitive gain for learners. In an attempt to resolve this dispute, we conducted a meta-analysis to decipher which teaching method, games and interactive simulations or traditional, truly dominates and under what circumstances. It was found that across people and situations, games and interactive simulations are more dominant for cognitive gain outcomes. However, consideration of...
-
Purpose of the Study.........................................................................................................6 Method ..............................................................................................................................7 Search and Selection Criteria ..................................................................................7 Procedure...
Explore
Outcome measure
- Behaviour (1)
- Engagement (1)
- Learning (12)
- Qualification (1)
- Socio-emotional learning (1)
Instructional domain (subject)
- Languages (1)
- Literacy (1)
- Mathematics (1)
- Multiple
- Science (1)
- Social Studies (1)
Education Level and Type
- ECE 0-7 (1)
- High school 16-18 (1)
- Informal education (1)
- K-12
- Primary 7-10 (1)
- Secondary 11-16 (1)
- Tertiary (6)
Groups of students
- _No mention (2)
- At-risk (4)
- Learning difficulties (1)
- Low-performing (1)
- Low socio-economic status (1)
- SEND (2)
School or home
- _No mention (2)
- Mixture (2)
- School (8)
Moderating variables
- __ no obvious moderating variables (1)
- Assessments (2)
- Design-type/ testing instruments (3)
- Feedback (1)
- Gender (1)
- Grade/education level (4)
- Length of time (8)
- Multiple exposures (1)
- Novelty Effect (1)
- Peer involvement/group learning (4)
- School-level factors (1)
- Student characteristics (1)
- Subject (4)
- Teacher involvement (6)
- Teacher pedagogy/implementation (1)
- Teacher professional development (2)
- Tech structure (1)
- Type of instruction methods (student/teacher centered) (3)
- Type of knowledge or task (exposing, procedural, active, etc (4)
Tech Hardware
- Assistive Devices for SEND (1)
- CD ROM/ DVD (1)
- Computer
- Handheld device (2)
- Infrastructure (2)
- Interactive whiteboards (2)
- Internet (2)
- Laptops (2)
- Mobile/Smartphone (1)
- Multimedia (1 or more) (1)
- Tablet (2)
Tech Software
Tech mechanism
Learning Approach
- _No mention (2)
- Blended learning (2)
- Classroom learning (8)
- Remote learning (2)
Teacher Pedagogy
- _No mention (2)
- Collaboration (4)
- Feedback (2)
- Flipped classroom (1)
- Game-based learning (2)
- Group learning (3)
- Individualised (1)
- Project-based learning (1)
- Scaffolding (1)
Research methods
Effect size/ heterogeneity
HIC/LMIC
- HIC (high income) (3)
- LMIC (middle/low) (2)
- Mixture or unknown (7)
Quality of research
- High: 6+ (6)
- Low: 3 or below (1)
- Medium: 4 or above (4)
Geography if specific
- _no mention (2)
- Mixture (1)
- Taiwan (1)
- Turkey (1)
- USA (1)