Your search
Results 6 resources
-
It is assumed that serious games influences learning in 2 ways, by changing cognitive processes and by affecting motivation. However, until now research has shown little evidence for these assumptions. We used meta-analytic techniques to investigate whether serious games are more effective in terms of learning and more motivating than conventional instruction methods (learning: k ϭ 77, N ϭ 5,547; motivation: k ϭ 31, N ϭ 2,216). Consistent with our hypotheses, serious games were found to be...
-
Substantial disagreement exists in the literature regarding which educational technology results in the highest cognitive gain for learners. In an attempt to resolve this dispute, we conducted a meta-analysis to decipher which teaching method, games and interactive simulations or traditional, truly dominates and under what circumstances. It was found that across people and situations, games and interactive simulations are more dominant for cognitive gain outcomes. However, consideration of...
-
Purpose of the Study.........................................................................................................6 Method ..............................................................................................................................7 Search and Selection Criteria ..................................................................................7 Procedure...
-
This study quantitatively synthesized the empirical research on the effects of social context (i.e., small group versus individual learning) when students learn using computer technology. In total, 486 independent findings were extracted from 122 studies involving 11,317 learners. The results indicate that, on average, small group learning had significantly more positive effects than individual learning on student individual achievement (mean ES = + 0.15), group task performance (mean ES = +...
Explore
Outcome measure
- Behaviour (1)
- Learning
- Motivation (1)
Instructional domain (subject)
- Computing (1)
- Languages (2)
- Mathematics (2)
- Multiple (5)
- Science (2)
- Social Studies (1)
Education Level and Type
- ECE 0-7 (2)
- High school 16-18 (2)
- Informal education (1)
- K-12
- Primary 7-10 (1)
- Secondary 11-16 (2)
- Tertiary (3)
Groups of students
- At-risk (3)
- EAL (1)
- Low-performing (2)
- Low socio-economic status (1)
School or home
- _No mention (1)
- Mixture (1)
- School (4)
Moderating variables
- __ no obvious moderating variables (2)
- Country / culture (1)
- Design-type/ testing instruments (1)
- Gender (1)
- Grade/education level (1)
- Length of time (2)
- Multiple exposures (1)
- Novelty Effect (1)
- Peer involvement/group learning (2)
- Subject (2)
- Teacher involvement (1)
- Teacher pedagogy/implementation (1)
- Type of instruction methods (student/teacher centered) (2)
- Type of knowledge or task (exposing, procedural, active, etc (1)
Tech Hardware
- Computer (4)
- Interactive whiteboards (1)
- Laptops (1)
- Mobile/Smartphone (1)
- Multimedia (1 or more) (1)
- Tablet (1)
Tech Software
- Augmented Reality (1)
- Computer-Assisted Instruction (CAI) (3)
- Computer-Based Teaching (CBT) (3)
- Digital Media (audiovisuals) (1)
- E-book software (1)
- Game learning (1)
- General apps (1)
- Graphic organisers/Visualisations (1)
- LMS (1)
- Serious games (1)
- Simulations (2)
- Virtual manipulatives (1)
- Word processor (1)
Tech mechanism
Learning Approach
- _No mention (2)
- Blended learning (1)
- Classroom learning (3)
Teacher Pedagogy
Research methods
Effect size/ heterogeneity
HIC/LMIC
- HIC (high income) (2)
- Mixture or unknown (3)
Quality of research
- High: 6+ (4)
- Medium: 4 or above (3)