Your search
Results 24 resources
-
In this study, we meta-analyzed empirical research of the effectiveness of intelligent tutoring systems (ITS) on K–12 students’ mathematical learning. A total of 26 reports containing 34 independent samples met study inclusion criteria. The reports appeared between 1997 and 2010. The majority of included studies compared the effectiveness of ITS with that of regular classroom instruction. A few studies compared ITS with human tutoring or homework practices. Among the major findings are (a)...
-
It is assumed that serious games influences learning in 2 ways, by changing cognitive processes and by affecting motivation. However, until now research has shown little evidence for these assumptions. We used meta-analytic techniques to investigate whether serious games are more effective in terms of learning and more motivating than conventional instruction methods (learning: k ϭ 77, N ϭ 5,547; motivation: k ϭ 31, N ϭ 2,216). Consistent with our hypotheses, serious games were found to be...
-
The purpose of this review is to learn from rigorous evaluations of alternative technology applications how features of using technology programs and characteristics of their evaluations affect reading outcomes for students in grades K-12. The review applies consistent inclusion standards to focus on studies that met high methodological standards. A total of 84 qualifying studies based on over 60,000 K-12 participants were included in the final analysis. Consistent with previous reviews of...
-
This study examines the impact of computer technology (CT) on mathematics education in K-12 classrooms through a systematic review of existing literature. A metaanalysis of 85 independent effect sizes extracted from 46 primary studies involving a total of 36,793 learners indicated statistically significant positive effects of CT on mathematics achievement. In addition, several characteristics of primary studies were identified as having effects. For example, CT showed advantage in promoting...
Explore
Outcome measure
- Attitudes (1)
- Behaviour (2)
- Engagement (1)
- Learning (23)
- Motivation (1)
- Qualification (1)
- Socio-emotional learning (2)
Instructional domain (subject)
- Computing (1)
- Languages (1)
- Literacy (6)
- Mathematics (6)
- Multiple (14)
- Science (3)
- Social Studies (1)
- STEM (1)
Education Level and Type
- ECE 0-7 (1)
- High school 16-18 (1)
- Informal education (1)
- K-12
- Primary 7-10 (1)
- Secondary 11-16 (1)
- Tertiary (7)
Groups of students
- _No mention (3)
- At-risk (2)
- EAL (3)
- Learning difficulties (1)
- Low-performing (2)
- Low socio-economic status (4)
- SEND (5)
School or home
- _No mention (1)
- Home (1)
- Mixture (3)
- School (13)
Moderating variables
- Assessments (3)
- Attainment level of students (1)
- Country / culture (1)
- Design-type/ testing instruments (8)
- Ethnicity (1)
- Feedback (2)
- Gender (1)
- Grade/education level (8)
- Implementation fidelity (1)
- IQ (1)
- Length of time (15)
- Multiple exposures (2)
- Novelty Effect (3)
- Peer involvement/group learning (5)
- SEND (1)
- Socio-economic status (1)
- Student characteristics (1)
- Subject (4)
- Teacher involvement (9)
- Teacher pedagogy/implementation (2)
- Teacher professional development (3)
- Tech structure (2)
- Type of instruction methods (student/teacher centered) (6)
- Type of knowledge or task (exposing, procedural, active, etc (6)
Tech Hardware
- Assistive Devices for SEND (1)
- CD ROM/ DVD (2)
- Computer (16)
- Handheld device (2)
- Infrastructure (2)
- Interactive whiteboards (3)
- Internet (2)
- Laptops (2)
- Mobile/Smartphone (2)
- Multimedia (1 or more) (5)
- Tablet (3)
Tech Software
- Audio books (1)
- Augmented Reality (1)
- Computer-Assisted Instruction (CAI) (9)
- Computer-Based Teaching (CBT) (5)
- Digital Media (audiovisuals) (3)
- Dynamic Geometry Software (1)
- E-book software (1)
- Game learning (5)
- General apps (5)
- Graphic organisers/Visualisations (4)
- Intelligent Tutoring (2)
- LMS (4)
- Robotics (1)
- Serious games (1)
- Simulations (3)
- Virtual manipulatives (2)
- Virtual Reality (3)
Tech mechanism
- _No mention (2)
- Cooperative learning (e.g. discussion areas) (3)
- Direct instruction (1)
- Drill and practice (2)
- Feedback (10)
- Gamification (3)
- Graphic modelling (1)
- Instructional supports/Demos: worked out examples (9)
- Multimedia effects (1)
- Personalization effect (2)
- Research/Homework/Assignments (1)
- Scaffolding/Varying difficulty levels (7)
- Virtual pen and notetaking (1)
Learning Approach
- _No mention (1)
- Blended learning (5)
- Classroom learning (16)
- Remote learning (4)
Teacher Pedagogy
- _No mention (2)
- Collaboration (7)
- Feedback (2)
- Flipped classroom (1)
- Game-based learning (2)
- Group learning (3)
- Individualised (1)
- PC mixed with real objects (1)
- Peer learning (3)
- Project-based learning (1)
- Scaffolding (4)
- Self-paced (no teacher) (1)
Research methods
Effect size/ heterogeneity
HIC/LMIC
- HIC (high income) (8)
- LMIC (middle/low) (1)
- Mixture or unknown (14)
Quality of research
- High: 6+ (13)
- Low: 3 or below (1)
- Medium: 4 or above (7)