Your search
Results 5 resources
-
Dynamic geometry software (DGS) aims to enhance mathematics education. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the quasi-experimental studies on the effectiveness of DGS-based instruction in improving students’ mathematical achievement. Research articles published between 1990 and 2013 were identified from major databases according to a prespecified search strategy and selection criteria. A meta-analysis was conducted based on the random-effects model to evaluate the effectiveness...
-
In this study, we meta-analyzed empirical research of the effectiveness of intelligent tutoring systems (ITS) on K–12 students’ mathematical learning. A total of 26 reports containing 34 independent samples met study inclusion criteria. The reports appeared between 1997 and 2010. The majority of included studies compared the effectiveness of ITS with that of regular classroom instruction. A few studies compared ITS with human tutoring or homework practices. Among the major findings are (a)...
-
A meta-analysis was performed to synthesize existing research comparing the effects of computerassisted instruction (CAI) versus traditional instruction (TI) on studentsÕ achievement in Taiwan. Fiftytwo studies were located from our sources, and their quantitative data was transformed into effect size (ES). The overall grand mean of the study-weighted ES for all 52 studies was 0.55. The results suggest that CAI is more effective than TI in Taiwan. In addition, two of the seventeen variables...
-
Substantial disagreement exists in the literature regarding which educational technology results in the highest cognitive gain for learners. In an attempt to resolve this dispute, we conducted a meta-analysis to decipher which teaching method, games and interactive simulations or traditional, truly dominates and under what circumstances. It was found that across people and situations, games and interactive simulations are more dominant for cognitive gain outcomes. However, consideration of...
Explore
Outcome measure
- Learning (5)
Instructional domain (subject)
- Languages (1)
- Mathematics (3)
- Multiple (3)
- Science (1)
Education Level and Type
- ECE 0-7 (1)
- High school 16-18 (1)
- Informal education (1)
- K-12
- Primary 7-10 (2)
- Secondary 11-16 (1)
- Tertiary (2)
Groups of students
- At-risk (2)
- Low-performing (1)
- Low socio-economic status (1)
Moderating variables
- Attainment level of students (1)
- Design-type/ testing instruments (2)
- Gender (1)
- Grade/education level (1)
- Length of time (4)
- Novelty Effect (1)
- Peer involvement/group learning (2)
- Subject (2)
- Teacher involvement (2)
- Teacher pedagogy/implementation (2)
- Type of instruction methods (student/teacher centered) (1)
- Type of knowledge or task (exposing, procedural, active, etc (1)
Tech Hardware
- Computer (4)
- Internet (1)
- Laptops (1)
- Multimedia (1 or more) (1)
Tech Software
Tech mechanism
Learning Approach
- _No mention (1)
- Blended learning (1)
- Classroom learning (4)
- Remote learning (1)
Teacher Pedagogy
- _No mention (1)
- Collaboration (2)
- Game-based learning (1)
- Group learning (2)
- Individualised (1)
- Project-based learning (1)
Research methods
Effect size/ heterogeneity
HIC/LMIC
- HIC (high income) (2)
- LMIC (middle/low) (1)
- Mixture or unknown (3)
Quality of research
Geography if specific
- _no mention (1)
- Taiwan (1)
- USA (1)