Your search
Results 5 resources
-
Previous empirical studies on the effect of scaffolding in game-based learning environments have shown inconsistent findings. In this study, we conducted a meta-analysis to examine the effect of scaffolding in digital game-based learning (DGBL) and to explore a range of moderating factors that may have contributed to the inconsistencies of primary studies. We used the three-level meta-analysis method to analyze the data for handling data non-dependency issues of multiple effect sizes in one...
-
This meta-analysis extended the current literature regarding the effects of computer technology (CT) on mathematics achievement, with a particular focus on low-performing students. A total of 45 independent effect sizes extracted from 31 empirical studies based on a total of 2,044 low-performing students in K-12 classrooms were included in this meta-analysis. Consistent with previous reviews, this study suggested a statistically significant and positive effect of CT ([Formula: see...
-
This meta-analysis maps the evidence on the effectiveness of instructional approaches and conditions for learning computer programming under three study conditions: (a) Studies focusing on the effectiveness of programming interventions per se, (b) studies focusing on the effectiveness of visualization and physicality, and (c) studies focusing on the effectiveness of dominant instructional approaches. Utilizing the data from 139 interventions and 375 effect sizes, we found (a) a strong effect...
-
In this meta-analysis, we investigated the effects of methods for providing item-based feedback in a computer-based environment on students’ learning outcomes. From 40 studies, 70 effect sizes were computed, which ranged from −0.78 to 2.29. A mixed model was used for the data analysis. The results show that elaborated feedback (EF; e.g., providing an explanation) produced larger effect sizes (0.49) than feedback regarding the correctness of the answer (KR; 0.05) or providing the correct...
-
A meta-analysis was performed to synthesize existing research comparing the effects of computerassisted instruction (CAI) versus traditional instruction (TI) on studentsÕ achievement in Taiwan. Fiftytwo studies were located from our sources, and their quantitative data was transformed into effect size (ES). The overall grand mean of the study-weighted ES for all 52 studies was 0.55. The results suggest that CAI is more effective than TI in Taiwan. In addition, two of the seventeen variables...
Explore
Outcome measure
- Learning (5)
Instructional domain (subject)
- Computing (1)
- Mathematics (2)
- Multiple (3)
- Science (1)
Education Level and Type
- ECE 0-7 (1)
- High school 16-18 (3)
- K-12 (3)
- Middle school (1)
- Primary 7-10 (3)
- Secondary 11-16 (3)
- Tertiary (2)
Groups of students
- _No mention (2)
- Low-performing (1)
- typically-developing students (1)
Moderating variables
- Design-type/ testing instruments (2)
- Grade/education level
- Length of time (4)
- Multiple exposures (1)
- Student characteristics (1)
- Subject (3)
- Teacher involvement (1)
- Teacher pedagogy/implementation (1)
- Tech structure (3)
- Type of instruction methods (student/teacher centered) (1)
- Type of knowledge or task (exposing, procedural, active, etc (1)
Tech Hardware
- Computer (5)
- Handheld device (1)
- Multimedia (1 or more) (2)
- Tablet (1)
- Touch-screen (1)
Tech Software
- Computer Algebra Systems (1)
- Computer-Assisted Instruction (CAI) (1)
- Computer-Based Teaching (CBT) (1)
- Game learning (1)
- General apps (2)
- Intelligent Tutoring (1)
- Simulations (1)
- Tutorials (1)
- Virtual Reality (1)
Tech mechanism
Learning Approach
Teacher Pedagogy
- _No mention (1)
- Feedback (2)
- Game-based learning (1)
Research methods
Effect size/ heterogeneity
HIC/LMIC
- LMIC (middle/low) (1)
- Mixture or unknown (3)
Quality of research
- High: 6+ (3)
- Medium: 4 or above (1)
Geography if specific
- _no mention (1)
- Mixture (1)
- Taiwan (1)