Your search
Results 6 resources
-
Previous empirical studies on the effect of scaffolding in game-based learning environments have shown inconsistent findings. In this study, we conducted a meta-analysis to examine the effect of scaffolding in digital game-based learning (DGBL) and to explore a range of moderating factors that may have contributed to the inconsistencies of primary studies. We used the three-level meta-analysis method to analyze the data for handling data non-dependency issues of multiple effect sizes in one...
-
In this meta-analysis, we investigated the effects of methods for providing item-based feedback in a computer-based environment on students’ learning outcomes. From 40 studies, 70 effect sizes were computed, which ranged from −0.78 to 2.29. A mixed model was used for the data analysis. The results show that elaborated feedback (EF; e.g., providing an explanation) produced larger effect sizes (0.49) than feedback regarding the correctness of the answer (KR; 0.05) or providing the correct...
-
This report presents an overview of the process and initial findings of a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature on computer simulations for K–12 science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) learning topics. Both quantitative and qualitative research studies on the effects of simulation in STEM were reviewed. Studies that reported effect size measures or the data to calculate effect sizes were included in the meta-analysis. Important moderating factors related to...
-
The purpose of this meta-analysis is to examine overall effect as well as the impact of selected instructional design principles in the context of virtual reality technology-based instruction (i.e. games, simulation, virtual worlds) in K-12 or higher education settings. A total of 13 studies (N ¼ 3081) in the category of games, 29 studies (N ¼ 2553) in the category of games, and 27 studies (N ¼ 2798) in the category of virtual worlds were meta-analyzed. The key inclusion criteria were that...
-
Since its advent word processing has become a common writing tool, providing potential advantages over writing by hand. Word processors permit easy revision, produce legible characters quickly, and may provide additional supports (e.g., spellcheckers, speech recognition). Such advantages should remedy common difficulties among weaker writers/readers in grades 1–12. Based on 27 studies with weaker writers, 20 of which were not considered in prior reviews, findings from this meta-analysis...
Explore
Outcome measure
- Attitudes (1)
- Learning (6)
- Motivation (1)
Instructional domain (subject)
- Literacy (1)
- Mathematics (2)
- Multiple (3)
- Science (1)
- STEM (1)
Education Level and Type
- High school 16-18 (1)
- K-12 (3)
- Primary 7-10 (3)
- Secondary 11-16 (2)
- Tertiary (1)
Groups of students
- _No mention (1)
- At-risk (1)
- EAL (1)
- Learning difficulties (2)
- Low-performing (2)
- Low socio-economic status (1)
School or home
- _No mention (1)
- School (4)
Moderating variables
- Assessments (1)
- Attainment level of students (1)
- Design-type/ testing instruments (1)
- Feedback (2)
- Grade/education level (2)
- Length of time (4)
- Novelty Effect (1)
- Peer involvement/group learning (2)
- Student characteristics (2)
- Subject (2)
- Teacher involvement (3)
- Tech structure (2)
- Type of instruction methods (student/teacher centered) (1)
- Type of knowledge or task (exposing, procedural, active, etc (2)
Tech Hardware
- Computer (5)
- Handheld device (1)
- Multimedia (1 or more) (1)
Tech Software
Tech mechanism
Learning Approach
- _No mention (1)
- Classroom learning (4)
Teacher Pedagogy
- Collaboration (2)
- Feedback (1)
- Peer learning (1)
- Scaffolding (1)
Research methods
Effect size/ heterogeneity
HIC/LMIC
Quality of research
- High: 6+ (5)
- Medium: 4 or above (1)
Geography if specific
- Mixture (1)