Your search
Results 5 resources
-
This meta-analysis extended the current literature regarding the effects of computer technology (CT) on mathematics achievement, with a particular focus on low-performing students. A total of 45 independent effect sizes extracted from 31 empirical studies based on a total of 2,044 low-performing students in K-12 classrooms were included in this meta-analysis. Consistent with previous reviews, this study suggested a statistically significant and positive effect of CT ([Formula: see...
-
Dynamic geometry software (DGS) aims to enhance mathematics education. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the quasi-experimental studies on the effectiveness of DGS-based instruction in improving students’ mathematical achievement. Research articles published between 1990 and 2013 were identified from major databases according to a prespecified search strategy and selection criteria. A meta-analysis was conducted based on the random-effects model to evaluate the effectiveness...
-
This article reports the results of a meta-analysis of technology-based intervention studies for children with autism spectrum disorders. We conducted a systematic review of research that used a pre–post design to assess innovative technology interventions, including computer programs, virtual reality, and robotics. The selected studies provided interventions via a desktop computer, interactive DVD, shared active surface, and virtual reality. None employed robotics. The results provide...
-
The purpose of this review is to learn from rigorous evaluations of alternative technology applications how features of using technology programs and characteristics of their evaluations affect reading outcomes for students in grades K-12. The review applies consistent inclusion standards to focus on studies that met high methodological standards. A total of 84 qualifying studies based on over 60,000 K-12 participants were included in the final analysis. Consistent with previous reviews of...
Explore
Outcome measure
- Behaviour (1)
- Learning (5)
- Socio-emotional learning (1)
Instructional domain (subject)
- Literacy (2)
- Mathematics (2)
- Multiple (1)
Education Level and Type
- ECE 0-7 (2)
- High school 16-18 (1)
- Informal education (1)
- K-12 (4)
- Middle school (1)
- Primary 7-10 (2)
- Secondary 11-16 (1)
- Tertiary (1)
Groups of students
- EAL (2)
- Low-performing (1)
- Low socio-economic status (1)
- SEND (1)
Moderating variables
- Country / culture (1)
- Design-type/ testing instruments (3)
- Ethnicity (1)
- Gender (1)
- Grade/education level (3)
- IQ (1)
- Length of time
- Multiple exposures (1)
- Novelty Effect (2)
- Peer involvement/group learning (1)
- SEND (1)
- Subject (1)
- Teacher involvement (3)
- Teacher pedagogy/implementation (2)
- Tech structure (1)
- Type of instruction methods (student/teacher centered) (1)
- Type of knowledge or task (exposing, procedural, active, etc (1)
Tech Hardware
- CD ROM/ DVD (1)
- Computer (3)
- Interactive whiteboards (1)
- Mobile/Smartphone (1)
- Multimedia (1 or more) (1)
- Tablet (1)
Tech Software
- Augmented Reality (1)
- Computer Algebra Systems (1)
- Computer-Assisted Instruction (CAI) (4)
- Computer-Based Teaching (CBT) (1)
- Digital Media (audiovisuals) (1)
- Dynamic Geometry Software (1)
- E-book software (1)
- Game learning (1)
- General apps
- Graphic organisers/Visualisations (1)
- Intelligent Tutoring (1)
- LMS (2)
- Robotics (1)
- Tutorials (1)
- Virtual manipulatives (1)
- Virtual Reality (1)
Tech mechanism
Learning Approach
- Blended learning (2)
- Classroom learning (4)
- Remote learning (1)
Teacher Pedagogy
- Collaboration (2)
- Feedback (1)
- Game-based learning (1)
- Group learning (1)
- PC mixed with real objects (1)
- Peer learning (1)
Research methods
Effect size/ heterogeneity
HIC/LMIC
- HIC (high income) (2)
- Mixture or unknown (4)
Quality of research
- High: 6+ (4)
- Medium: 4 or above (1)