Your search
Results 5 resources
-
In this meta-analysis, we systematically reviewed research on digital games and learning for K–16 students. We synthesized comparisons of game versus nongame conditions (i.e., media comparisons) and comparisons of augmented games versus standard game designs (i.e., value-added comparisons). We used random-effects meta-regression models with robust variance estimates to summarize overall effects and explore potential moderator effects. Results from media comparisons indicated that digital...
-
The purpose of this research study was to determine the overall effectiveness of computer-based laboratory compared with the traditional hands-on laboratory for improving students’ science academic achievement and attitudes towards science subjects at the college and pre-college levels of education in the United States. Meta-analysis was used to synthesis the findings from 38 primary research studies conducted and/or reported in the United States between 1996 and 2006 that compared the...
-
The English Review Group completed an overarching systematic review of the impact of Information and Communication Technology (ICT) on literacy learning in English in 2002 (Andrews et al., 2002). In this review, a ‘map’ described all the included research in the field. An in-depth sub-review reported on the impact of networked ICT on literacy learning (Andrews et al., 2002). This present review is one of a further four in-depth sub-reviews that address aspects of the overarching question –...
Explore
Instructional domain (subject)
- Languages (1)
- Literacy (1)
- Mathematics (1)
- Multiple (3)
- Science (2)
Education Level and Type
- ECE 0-7 (1)
- K-12 (4)
- Primary 7-10 (1)
- Secondary 11-16 (1)
- Tertiary (2)
Groups of students
- At-risk (1)
- EAL (2)
- Low socio-economic status (1)
- SEND (1)
School or home
- _No mention (1)
- Mixture (1)
- School (4)
Moderating variables
- __ no obvious moderating variables (1)
- Assessments (1)
- Country / culture (1)
- Design-type/ testing instruments (2)
- Grade/education level (1)
- Length of time (3)
- Novelty Effect (1)
- Peer involvement/group learning (1)
- Student characteristics (1)
- Subject (2)
- Teacher pedagogy/implementation (1)
- Tech structure (1)
- Type of instruction methods (student/teacher centered) (2)
- Type of knowledge or task (exposing, procedural, active, etc (1)
Tech Hardware
- Computer (4)
- Interactive whiteboards (1)
- Laptops (1)
- Mobile/Smartphone (1)
- Multimedia (1 or more) (1)
- Tablet (1)
Tech Software
Tech mechanism
- _No mention (2)
- Cooperative learning (e.g. discussion areas) (3)
- Direct instruction (1)
- Drill and practice (1)
- Feedback (3)
- Gamification (1)
- Instructional supports/Demos: worked out examples (1)
- Multimedia effects (1)
- Research/Homework/Assignments (1)
- Scaffolding/Varying difficulty levels (1)
- Virtual pen and notetaking (1)
Learning Approach
- _No mention (2)
- Blended learning (1)
- Classroom learning (2)
Teacher Pedagogy
- _No mention (1)
- Collaboration (3)
- Feedback (1)
- Game-based learning (1)
- Group learning (2)
- Individualised (1)
- PC mixed with real objects (1)
- Peer learning (1)
- Project-based learning (1)
- Scaffolding (2)
Research methods
Effect size/ heterogeneity
HIC/LMIC
- HIC (high income) (2)
- Mixture or unknown (3)
Quality of research
- High: 6+ (4)
- Medium: 4 or above (1)