Your search
Results 6 resources
-
Digital game-based learning (DGBL) is known to be widely used for improving learning in various fields. Among the elements of DGBL, competition has been very controversial. This meta-analysis, which included 25 articles written between 2008 and 2019, revealed that DGBL has produced improvements for learning outcomes with an overall effect size of .386. In addition, we explored multiple moderators to understand how competition in DGBL influenced student learning for different learners,...
-
Clickers, formerly known as instant response systems, have gradually become an integral part of the classroom. Though several reviews on research into clicker-integrated instruction have been published within this decade, the controversy over whether clickerintegrated instruction is effective to enhance students' learning gains has not been settled because the early reviews mainly focus on students' perceptions toward and acceptance of clicker-integrated instruction. Furthermore, so far...
-
In this meta-analysis, we systematically reviewed research on digital games and learning for K–16 students. We synthesized comparisons of game versus nongame conditions (i.e., media comparisons) and comparisons of augmented games versus standard game designs (i.e., value-added comparisons). We used random-effects meta-regression models with robust variance estimates to summarize overall effects and explore potential moderator effects. Results from media comparisons indicated that digital...
-
The present meta-analysis challenges the notion that young children necessarily need adult scaffolding in order to understand a narrative story and learn words as long as they encounter optimally designed multimedia stories. Including 29 studies and 1272 children, multimedia stories were found more beneficial than encounters with traditional story materials that did not include the help of an adult for story comprehension (g+ = 0.40, k = 18) as well as vocabulary (g+ = 0.30, k = 11). However,...
Explore
Outcome measure
- Learning (6)
Instructional domain (subject)
- Languages (1)
- Literacy (2)
- Mathematics (2)
- Multiple (5)
- Science (2)
- Social Studies (1)
- STEM (1)
Education Level and Type
- ECE 0-7 (1)
- High school 16-18 (1)
- K-12 (3)
- Middle school (1)
- Primary 7-10 (2)
- Secondary 11-16 (1)
- Tertiary (2)
Groups of students
- _No mention (2)
- At-risk (1)
- EAL (2)
- Learning difficulties (1)
- Low-performing (1)
- Low socio-economic status (2)
- SEND (1)
School or home
- _No mention (2)
- Mixture (2)
- School (3)
Moderating variables
- Assessments (2)
- Country / culture (2)
- Design-type/ testing instruments (2)
- Feedback (1)
- Grade/education level (2)
- Length of time (4)
- Multiple exposures (2)
- Novelty Effect (2)
- Peer involvement/group learning (2)
- School-level factors (1)
- Student characteristics (2)
- Subject (2)
- Teacher pedagogy/implementation (1)
- Tech structure (2)
- Type of instruction methods (student/teacher centered) (2)
- Type of knowledge or task (exposing, procedural, active, etc (1)
Tech Hardware
- CD ROM/ DVD (1)
- Computer (3)
- E-book hardware - e.g. kindle (1)
- Interactive whiteboards (1)
- Laptops (1)
- Mobile/Smartphone (1)
- Multimedia (1 or more) (4)
- Radio (1)
- Tablet (1)
- TV (1)
Tech Software
- Audio books (1)
- Augmented Reality (1)
- Clicker-integrated instruction (1)
- Computer-Assisted Instruction (CAI) (1)
- Computer-Based Teaching (CBT) (2)
- Digital Media (audiovisuals) (2)
- E-book software (2)
- Game learning (2)
- General apps (2)
- Graphic organisers/Visualisations (2)
- LMS (1)
- Serious games (1)
- Virtual manipulatives (1)
Tech mechanism
- Cooperative learning (e.g. discussion areas) (3)
- Direct instruction (1)
- Drill and practice (1)
- Feedback (4)
- Gamification (1)
- Instructional supports/Demos: worked out examples (1)
- Multimedia effects (2)
- Research/Homework/Assignments (1)
- Scaffolding/Varying difficulty levels (2)
- Virtual pen and notetaking (1)
Learning Approach
- _No mention (2)
- Blended learning (1)
- Classroom learning (3)
Teacher Pedagogy
- _No mention (2)
- Collaboration (3)
- Feedback (1)
- Game-based learning (1)
- Group learning (4)
- Individualised (1)
- PC mixed with real objects (1)
- Peer learning (2)
- Project-based learning (1)
- Scaffolding (1)
Research methods
Effect size/ heterogeneity
HIC/LMIC
- HIC (high income) (4)
- Mixture or unknown (3)
Quality of research
- High: 6+ (3)
- Medium: 4 or above (3)