Your search
Results 5 resources
-
This meta-analysis extended the current literature regarding the effects of computer technology (CT) on mathematics achievement, with a particular focus on low-performing students. A total of 45 independent effect sizes extracted from 31 empirical studies based on a total of 2,044 low-performing students in K-12 classrooms were included in this meta-analysis. Consistent with previous reviews, this study suggested a statistically significant and positive effect of CT ([Formula: see...
-
The present article attempts to reinterpret the findings of most recent studies investigating effect of using games for teaching purposes. A methodological approach combining a meta-analysis of quantitative data with qualitative ones was adopted in order to present the broadest picture of the current research on educational use of games. To this end, we conducted a meta-analysis of 180 effect size comparisons out of 154 empirical studies on the effect of both digital and non-digital games on...
-
Digital game-based learning (DGBL) is known to be widely used for improving learning in various fields. Among the elements of DGBL, competition has been very controversial. This meta-analysis, which included 25 articles written between 2008 and 2019, revealed that DGBL has produced improvements for learning outcomes with an overall effect size of .386. In addition, we explored multiple moderators to understand how competition in DGBL influenced student learning for different learners,...
-
Meta-analytical research has shown that computer technology can play a significant role in increasing positive learning outcomes of students. Research on this topic has resulted in conflicting findings on academic achievement and other measures of student outcomes. The current meta-analysis sought to assess the level of differences that existed between students being instructed with computer technology versus the academic achievement outcomes of students instructed with traditional methods....
-
This study quantitatively synthesized the empirical research on the effects of social context (i.e., small group versus individual learning) when students learn using computer technology. In total, 486 independent findings were extracted from 122 studies involving 11,317 learners. The results indicate that, on average, small group learning had significantly more positive effects than individual learning on student individual achievement (mean ES = + 0.15), group task performance (mean ES = +...
Explore
Outcome measure
- Attitudes (1)
- Behaviour (1)
- Learning
- Motivation (1)
- Socio-emotional learning (1)
Instructional domain (subject)
- Computing (2)
- Languages (2)
- Literacy (2)
- Mathematics
- Multiple (2)
- Science (4)
- Social Studies (4)
- STEM (1)
Education Level and Type
- ECE 0-7 (2)
- High school 16-18 (2)
- K-12 (2)
- Middle school (2)
- Primary 7-10 (2)
- Secondary 11-16 (2)
- Tertiary (1)
Groups of students
- _No mention (2)
- Gifted students (1)
- Low-performing (2)
- SEND (1)
- typically-developing students (1)
School or home
- _No mention (2)
- Home (1)
- Mixture (1)
- School (1)
Moderating variables
- __ no obvious moderating variables (2)
- Class size (1)
- Country / culture (1)
- Design-type/ testing instruments (1)
- Grade/education level (1)
- Length of time (2)
- Multiple exposures (1)
- School-level factors (1)
- Student characteristics (2)
- Teacher involvement (1)
- Teacher pedagogy/implementation (1)
- Tech structure (3)
Tech Hardware
- Computer (3)
- Multimedia (1 or more) (2)
Tech Software
- Computer Algebra Systems (1)
- Computer-Assisted Instruction (CAI) (2)
- Computer-Based Teaching (CBT) (1)
- Game learning (2)
- General apps (3)
- Intelligent Tutoring (1)
- Serious games (1)
- Simulations (1)
- Tutorials (1)
- Word processor (1)
Tech mechanism
- _No mention (2)
- Feedback (1)
- Gamification (1)
Learning Approach
- _No mention (2)
- Classroom learning (1)
Teacher Pedagogy
- _No mention (1)
- Feedback (1)
- Game-based learning (1)
- Group learning (2)
- Peer learning (1)
- Scaffolding (1)
Research methods
Effect size/ heterogeneity
HIC/LMIC
- HIC (high income) (1)
- Mixture or unknown (5)
Quality of research
- High: 6+ (4)
- Medium: 4 or above (1)
Geography if specific
- _no mention
- USA (1)