Your search
Results 5 resources
-
A meta-analysis was conducted on the effects of computer-supported early literacy interventions (strict phonological awareness training, combined phonological awareness and letter training, and use of e-books) on phonological-awareness (syllabic awareness, word blending, rhyme, phoneme awareness) and reading-related skills (concept about print, letter knowledge, decoding, spelling) across different languages in preschool and kindergarten since 1995. A total of 59 studies were identified with a...
-
This review describes a meta-analysis of findings from 50 controlled evaluations of intelligent computer tutoring systems. The median effect of intelligent tutoring in the 50 evaluations was to raise test scores 0.66 standard deviations over conventional levels, or from the 50th to the 75th percentile. However, the amount of improvement found in an evaluation depended to a great extent on whether improvement was measured on locally developed or standardized tests, suggesting that alignment...
-
The purpose of this review is to learn from rigorous evaluations of alternative technology applications how features of using technology programs and characteristics of their evaluations affect reading outcomes for students in grades K-12. The review applies consistent inclusion standards to focus on studies that met high methodological standards. A total of 84 qualifying studies based on over 60,000 K-12 participants were included in the final analysis. Consistent with previous reviews of...
-
How effective are computer-assisted instruction (CAI) programs in supporting beginning readers? This article reviews 42 studies published from 1990 onward, comprising a total of 75 experimental comparisons. The corrected overall effect size estimate was d = 0.19 (± 0.06). Effect sizes were found to depend on two study characteristics: the effect size at the time of pre-testing and the language of instruction (English or other). These two variables accounted for 61 percent of the variability...
Explore
Outcome measure
- Learning (5)
Instructional domain (subject)
- Computing (2)
-
Literacy
- Comprehension (2)
- Language (2)
- Reading
- vocabulary (1)
- writing (1)
- Mathematics (1)
- Multiple (1)
- Science (1)
Education Level and Type
- ECE 0-7 (2)
- High school 16-18 (1)
- K-12 (2)
- Primary 7-10 (1)
- Tertiary (1)
Groups of students
- EAL (1)
- Learning difficulties (1)
- Low-performing (2)
- Low socio-economic status (1)
- SEND (2)
School or home
- School (3)
Moderating variables
- Assessments (1)
- Design-type/ testing instruments (2)
- Ethnicity (1)
- Gender (1)
- Grade/education level (1)
- Length of time (1)
- SEND (1)
- Teacher involvement (1)
- Teacher professional development (1)
Tech Hardware
- Computer (3)
- Multimedia (1 or more) (1)
Tech Software
- Computer-Assisted Instruction (CAI) (3)
- Computer-Based Teaching (CBT) (1)
- Digital Media (audiovisuals) (1)
- E-book software (1)
- Game learning (1)
- General apps (3)
- Intelligent Tutoring (1)
- LMS (1)
Tech mechanism
Learning Approach
Teacher Pedagogy
- Feedback (1)
- Group learning (1)
- Scaffolding (1)
Research methods
Effect size/ heterogeneity
HIC/LMIC
Quality of research
- High: 6+ (2)
- Medium: 4 or above (2)
Geography if specific
- _no mention (1)
- USA (1)