Your search
Results 8 resources
-
Language abilities in the early years are a strong predictor of children’s success in school. However, a considerable number of children enter school with poor language skills. Therefore, one of the most important but also challenging mandates of early childhood education and care [ECEC] is to promote these skills before school enrolment. Meta-analytic evidence suggests that shared book reading is a valuable tool to narrow this gap in the early years. In the digital age, ebooks might offer...
-
Identifying effective literacy instruction programs has been a focal point for governments, educators and parents over the last few decades (Ontario Ministry of Education, 2004, 2006; Council of Ontario Directors of Education, 2011). Given the increasing use of computer technologies in the classroom and in the home, a variety of information communication technology (ICT) interventions for learning have been introduced. Meta-analyses comparing the impact of these programs on learning,...
-
This article reports the results of a meta-analysis of technology-based intervention studies for children with autism spectrum disorders. We conducted a systematic review of research that used a pre–post design to assess innovative technology interventions, including computer programs, virtual reality, and robotics. The selected studies provided interventions via a desktop computer, interactive DVD, shared active surface, and virtual reality. None employed robotics. The results provide...
-
The purpose of this review is to learn from rigorous evaluations of alternative technology applications how features of using technology programs and characteristics of their evaluations affect reading outcomes for students in grades K-12. The review applies consistent inclusion standards to focus on studies that met high methodological standards. A total of 84 qualifying studies based on over 60,000 K-12 participants were included in the final analysis. Consistent with previous reviews of...
-
The results of a meta-analysis of 20 research articles containing 89 effect sizes related to the use of digital tools and learning environments to enhance literacy acquisition for middle school students demonstrate that technology can have a positive effect on reading comprehension (weighted effect size of 0.489). Very little research has focused on the effect of technology on other important aspects of reading, such as metacognitive, affective, and dispositional outcomes. The evidence...
Explore
Outcome measure
- Behaviour (1)
- Learning (8)
- Socio-emotional learning (1)
Instructional domain (subject)
-
Literacy
- Comprehension (2)
- Language (1)
- Language development (1)
- Reading (5)
- Spelling (1)
- writing (1)
- Multiple (1)
- Social Studies (1)
Education Level and Type
- ECE 0-7 (2)
- Informal education (1)
- K-12 (5)
- Middle school (2)
- Secondary 11-16 (1)
- Tertiary (1)
Groups of students
- At-risk (1)
- EAL (2)
- Examination years (2)
- Learning difficulties (2)
- Low-performing (1)
- Low socio-economic status (2)
- SEND (3)
- typically-developing students (1)
School or home
- School (6)
Moderating variables
- __ no obvious moderating variables (2)
- Design-type/ testing instruments (2)
- Ethnicity (1)
- Gender (1)
- Grade/education level (2)
- Implementation fidelity (1)
- IQ (1)
- Length of time (4)
- Multiple exposures (2)
- SEND (2)
- Teacher involvement (4)
- Teacher professional development (1)
- Type of instruction methods (student/teacher centered) (1)
Tech Hardware
- CD ROM/ DVD (1)
- Computer (7)
- E-book hardware - e.g. kindle (1)
- Handheld device (2)
- Interactive whiteboards (1)
- Multimedia (1 or more) (4)
- Tablet (1)
- Touch-screen (1)
Tech Software
- Computer-Assisted Instruction (CAI) (6)
- Computer-Based Teaching (CBT) (1)
- Digital Media (audiovisuals) (1)
- E-book software (2)
- Game learning (1)
- General apps (3)
- Graphic organisers/Visualisations (1)
- LMS (1)
- Robotics (1)
- Simulations (1)
- Tutorials (1)
- Virtual Reality (1)
- Word processor (1)
Tech mechanism
Learning Approach
Teacher Pedagogy
- _No mention (1)
- Group learning (1)
- Scaffolding (1)
Research methods
Effect size/ heterogeneity
HIC/LMIC
Quality of research
- High: 6+ (6)
- Low: 3 or below (1)
- Medium: 4 or above (1)
Geography if specific
- _no mention (2)
- Mixture (1)