Your search
Results 7 resources
-
Clickers, formerly known as instant response systems, have gradually become an integral part of the classroom. Though several reviews on research into clicker-integrated instruction have been published within this decade, the controversy over whether clickerintegrated instruction is effective to enhance students' learning gains has not been settled because the early reviews mainly focus on students' perceptions toward and acceptance of clicker-integrated instruction. Furthermore, so far...
-
In this meta-analysis, we investigated the effects of methods for providing item-based feedback in a computer-based environment on students’ learning outcomes. From 40 studies, 70 effect sizes were computed, which ranged from −0.78 to 2.29. A mixed model was used for the data analysis. The results show that elaborated feedback (EF; e.g., providing an explanation) produced larger effect sizes (0.49) than feedback regarding the correctness of the answer (KR; 0.05) or providing the correct...
-
The purpose of this meta-analysis is to examine overall effect as well as the impact of selected instructional design principles in the context of virtual reality technology-based instruction (i.e. games, simulation, virtual worlds) in K-12 or higher education settings. A total of 13 studies (N ¼ 3081) in the category of games, 29 studies (N ¼ 2553) in the category of games, and 27 studies (N ¼ 2798) in the category of virtual worlds were meta-analyzed. The key inclusion criteria were that...
-
Substantial disagreement exists in the literature regarding which educational technology results in the highest cognitive gain for learners. In an attempt to resolve this dispute, we conducted a meta-analysis to decipher which teaching method, games and interactive simulations or traditional, truly dominates and under what circumstances. It was found that across people and situations, games and interactive simulations are more dominant for cognitive gain outcomes. However, consideration of...
-
Purpose of the Study.........................................................................................................6 Method ..............................................................................................................................7 Search and Selection Criteria ..................................................................................7 Procedure...
Explore
Instructional domain (subject)
- Literacy (1)
- Multiple
- Social Studies (1)
- STEM (1)
Education Level and Type
- ECE 0-7 (1)
- High school 16-18 (1)
- Informal education (1)
- K-12 (5)
- Primary 7-10 (2)
- Secondary 11-16 (2)
- Tertiary (3)
Groups of students
- _No mention (2)
- At-risk (2)
- Learning difficulties (1)
- Low-performing (1)
- SEND (2)
School or home
Moderating variables
- __ no obvious moderating variables (2)
- Assessments (2)
- Feedback (2)
- Gender (1)
- Grade/education level (2)
- Length of time (4)
- Multiple exposures (2)
- Novelty Effect (2)
- Peer involvement/group learning (3)
- Subject (1)
- Teacher involvement (3)
- Type of instruction methods (student/teacher centered) (1)
- Type of knowledge or task (exposing, procedural, active, etc (2)
Tech Hardware
- Computer (5)
- Handheld device (1)
- Multimedia (1 or more) (1)
- Tablet (1)
Tech Software
Tech mechanism
Learning Approach
- _No mention (1)
- Classroom learning (5)
Teacher Pedagogy
- Collaboration (2)
- Feedback (3)
- Game-based learning (1)
- Group learning (3)
- PC mixed with real objects (1)
- Peer learning (1)
Research methods
Effect size/ heterogeneity
HIC/LMIC
Quality of research
- High: 6+ (3)
- Low: 3 or below (1)
- Medium: 4 or above (3)