Your search
Results 6 resources
-
The present article attempts to reinterpret the findings of most recent studies investigating effect of using games for teaching purposes. A methodological approach combining a meta-analysis of quantitative data with qualitative ones was adopted in order to present the broadest picture of the current research on educational use of games. To this end, we conducted a meta-analysis of 180 effect size comparisons out of 154 empirical studies on the effect of both digital and non-digital games on...
-
Digital game-based learning (DGBL) is known to be widely used for improving learning in various fields. Among the elements of DGBL, competition has been very controversial. This meta-analysis, which included 25 articles written between 2008 and 2019, revealed that DGBL has produced improvements for learning outcomes with an overall effect size of .386. In addition, we explored multiple moderators to understand how competition in DGBL influenced student learning for different learners,...
-
Dynamic geometry software (DGS) aims to enhance mathematics education. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the quasi-experimental studies on the effectiveness of DGS-based instruction in improving students’ mathematical achievement. Research articles published between 1990 and 2013 were identified from major databases according to a prespecified search strategy and selection criteria. A meta-analysis was conducted based on the random-effects model to evaluate the effectiveness...
-
This article reports the results of a meta-analysis of technology-based intervention studies for children with autism spectrum disorders. We conducted a systematic review of research that used a pre–post design to assess innovative technology interventions, including computer programs, virtual reality, and robotics. The selected studies provided interventions via a desktop computer, interactive DVD, shared active surface, and virtual reality. None employed robotics. The results provide...
-
The purpose of this review is to learn from rigorous evaluations of alternative technology applications how features of using technology programs and characteristics of their evaluations affect reading outcomes for students in grades K-12. The review applies consistent inclusion standards to focus on studies that met high methodological standards. A total of 84 qualifying studies based on over 60,000 K-12 participants were included in the final analysis. Consistent with previous reviews of...
Explore
Outcome measure
- Behaviour (1)
- Learning (6)
- Socio-emotional learning (1)
Instructional domain (subject)
- Computing (1)
- Languages (1)
- Literacy (4)
- Mathematics (3)
- Multiple (2)
- Science (2)
- Social Studies (2)
- STEM (1)
Education Level and Type
- ECE 0-7 (1)
- High school 16-18 (1)
- Informal education (1)
- K-12 (3)
- Middle school (2)
- Primary 7-10 (2)
- Secondary 11-16 (1)
- Tertiary (1)
Groups of students
- _No mention (2)
- EAL (1)
- Examination years (1)
- Gifted students (1)
- Low socio-economic status (1)
- SEND (1)
School or home
- _No mention (1)
- Home (1)
- School (3)
Moderating variables
- __ no obvious moderating variables (1)
- Class size (1)
- Country / culture (1)
- Design-type/ testing instruments (1)
- Ethnicity (1)
- Gender (1)
- Grade/education level (1)
- IQ (1)
- Length of time (4)
- Novelty Effect (1)
- Peer involvement/group learning (1)
- School-level factors (1)
- SEND (1)
- Student characteristics (2)
- Teacher involvement (2)
- Teacher pedagogy/implementation (2)
- Tech structure (2)
Tech Hardware
- CD ROM/ DVD (1)
- Computer (3)
- Handheld device (1)
- Multimedia (1 or more) (4)
Tech Software
- Computer-Assisted Instruction (CAI) (3)
- Dynamic Geometry Software (1)
- Game learning (3)
- General apps
- LMS (1)
- Robotics (1)
- Serious games (1)
- Simulations (1)
- Tutorials (1)
- Virtual Reality (1)
- Word processor (1)
Tech mechanism
Learning Approach
- Blended learning (1)
- Classroom learning (5)
- Remote learning (1)
Teacher Pedagogy
- _No mention (2)
- Collaboration (1)
- Group learning (1)
Research methods
Effect size/ heterogeneity
HIC/LMIC
Quality of research
- High: 6+ (4)
- Medium: 4 or above (2)
Geography if specific
- _no mention (3)