Your search
Results 12 resources
-
The present article attempts to reinterpret the findings of most recent studies investigating effect of using games for teaching purposes. A methodological approach combining a meta-analysis of quantitative data with qualitative ones was adopted in order to present the broadest picture of the current research on educational use of games. To this end, we conducted a meta-analysis of 180 effect size comparisons out of 154 empirical studies on the effect of both digital and non-digital games on...
-
Clickers, formerly known as instant response systems, have gradually become an integral part of the classroom. Though several reviews on research into clicker-integrated instruction have been published within this decade, the controversy over whether clickerintegrated instruction is effective to enhance students' learning gains has not been settled because the early reviews mainly focus on students' perceptions toward and acceptance of clicker-integrated instruction. Furthermore, so far...
-
This research aims to investigate the effect of computer-based teaching (CBT) on students’ academic success. The research used a meta-analytic method to reach a general conclusion by statistically calculating the results of a number of independent studies. In total, 78 studies (62 master’s theses, 4 PhD theses, and 12 articles) concerning this issue were researched based on the literature review of the articles and theses which involved pre-test and post-test control groups and were...
-
There is no questioning that the way people live, interact, communicate, and conduct business is undergoing a profound, rapid change. This change is often referred to as the “digital revolution,” which is the advancement of technology from analog, electronic and mechanical tools to the digital tools available today. Moreover, technology has begun to change education, affecting how students acquire the skill sets needed to prepare for college and a career and how educators integrate digital...
-
In this meta-analysis, we investigated the effects of methods for providing item-based feedback in a computer-based environment on students’ learning outcomes. From 40 studies, 70 effect sizes were computed, which ranged from −0.78 to 2.29. A mixed model was used for the data analysis. The results show that elaborated feedback (EF; e.g., providing an explanation) produced larger effect sizes (0.49) than feedback regarding the correctness of the answer (KR; 0.05) or providing the correct...
-
Giving a student control over their learning has theoretical and intuitive appeal, but its effects are neither powerful nor consistent in the empirical literature base. This meta-analysis updated previous meta-analytic research by Niemiec, Sikorski, and Walberg by studying the overall effectiveness of providing learner control within educational technology, the characteristics of instruction along the continuum of learner control, and elements of the instructional environments that may play...
-
The purpose of this meta-analysis is to examine overall effect as well as the impact of selected instructional design principles in the context of virtual reality technology-based instruction (i.e. games, simulation, virtual worlds) in K-12 or higher education settings. A total of 13 studies (N ¼ 3081) in the category of games, 29 studies (N ¼ 2553) in the category of games, and 27 studies (N ¼ 2798) in the category of virtual worlds were meta-analyzed. The key inclusion criteria were that...
-
A meta-analysis was performed to synthesize existing research comparing the effects of computerassisted instruction (CAI) versus traditional instruction (TI) on studentsÕ achievement in Taiwan. Fiftytwo studies were located from our sources, and their quantitative data was transformed into effect size (ES). The overall grand mean of the study-weighted ES for all 52 studies was 0.55. The results suggest that CAI is more effective than TI in Taiwan. In addition, two of the seventeen variables...
-
Purpose of the Study.........................................................................................................6 Method ..............................................................................................................................7 Search and Selection Criteria ..................................................................................7 Procedure...
Explore
Instructional domain (subject)
- Computing (1)
- Languages (2)
- Literacy (1)
- Mathematics (2)
- Multiple
- Science (2)
- Social Studies (2)
- STEM (2)
Groups of students
- _No mention (4)
- At-risk (3)
- EAL (1)
- Gifted students (1)
- Learning difficulties (1)
- Low-performing (1)
- Low socio-economic status (1)
- SEND (1)
Moderating variables
- __ no obvious moderating variables (1)
- Assessments (2)
- Class size (1)
- Country / culture (1)
- Design-type/ testing instruments (2)
- Feedback (2)
- Grade/education level (6)
- Length of time (10)
- Multiple exposures (2)
- Novelty Effect (3)
- Peer involvement/group learning (2)
- Student characteristics (1)
- Subject (5)
- Teacher involvement (4)
- Teacher pedagogy/implementation (3)
- Teacher professional development (2)
- Tech structure (1)
- Type of instruction methods (student/teacher centered) (3)
- Type of knowledge or task (exposing, procedural, active, etc (4)
Tech Hardware
- CD ROM/ DVD (1)
- Computer (8)
- Handheld device (1)
- Infrastructure (1)
- Interactive whiteboards (2)
- Internet (1)
- Laptops (1)
- Mobile/Smartphone (1)
- Multimedia (1 or more) (2)
- Tablet (2)
Tech Software
- Audio books (1)
- Augmented Reality (1)
- Clicker-integrated instruction (1)
- Computer-Assisted Instruction (CAI) (6)
- Computer-Based Teaching (CBT) (4)
- Digital Media (audiovisuals) (1)
- E-book software (1)
- Game learning (3)
- General apps (2)
- Graphic organisers/Visualisations (2)
- LMS (1)
- Simulations (1)
- Virtual manipulatives (1)
- Virtual Reality (2)
Tech mechanism
- _No mention (2)
- Cooperative learning (e.g. discussion areas) (2)
- Direct instruction (1)
- Drill and practice (2)
- Feedback (6)
- Gamification (2)
- Instructional supports/Demos: worked out examples (4)
- Personalization effect (1)
- Research/Homework/Assignments (1)
- Scaffolding/Varying difficulty levels (2)
- Virtual pen and notetaking (1)
Learning Approach
Teacher Pedagogy
- _No mention (2)
- Collaboration (4)
- Feedback (3)
- Flipped classroom (1)
- Group learning (4)
- Individualised (1)
- PC mixed with real objects (1)
- Peer learning (2)
- Project-based learning (1)
- Scaffolding (1)
- Self-paced (no teacher) (1)
Research methods
Effect size/ heterogeneity
HIC/LMIC
- HIC (high income) (4)
- LMIC (middle/low) (1)
- Mixture or unknown (7)
Quality of research
- High: 6+ (6)
- Low: 3 or below (1)
- Medium: 4 or above (5)