Your search
Results 8 resources
-
This research aims to investigate the effect of computer-based teaching (CBT) on students’ academic success. The research used a meta-analytic method to reach a general conclusion by statistically calculating the results of a number of independent studies. In total, 78 studies (62 master’s theses, 4 PhD theses, and 12 articles) concerning this issue were researched based on the literature review of the articles and theses which involved pre-test and post-test control groups and were...
-
There is no questioning that the way people live, interact, communicate, and conduct business is undergoing a profound, rapid change. This change is often referred to as the “digital revolution,” which is the advancement of technology from analog, electronic and mechanical tools to the digital tools available today. Moreover, technology has begun to change education, affecting how students acquire the skill sets needed to prepare for college and a career and how educators integrate digital...
-
In this meta-analysis, we investigated the effects of methods for providing item-based feedback in a computer-based environment on students’ learning outcomes. From 40 studies, 70 effect sizes were computed, which ranged from −0.78 to 2.29. A mixed model was used for the data analysis. The results show that elaborated feedback (EF; e.g., providing an explanation) produced larger effect sizes (0.49) than feedback regarding the correctness of the answer (KR; 0.05) or providing the correct...
-
The purpose of this meta-analysis is to examine overall effect as well as the impact of selected instructional design principles in the context of virtual reality technology-based instruction (i.e. games, simulation, virtual worlds) in K-12 or higher education settings. A total of 13 studies (N ¼ 3081) in the category of games, 29 studies (N ¼ 2553) in the category of games, and 27 studies (N ¼ 2798) in the category of virtual worlds were meta-analyzed. The key inclusion criteria were that...
-
A meta-analysis was performed to synthesize existing research comparing the effects of computerassisted instruction (CAI) versus traditional instruction (TI) on studentsÕ achievement in Taiwan. Fiftytwo studies were located from our sources, and their quantitative data was transformed into effect size (ES). The overall grand mean of the study-weighted ES for all 52 studies was 0.55. The results suggest that CAI is more effective than TI in Taiwan. In addition, two of the seventeen variables...
-
Purpose of the Study.........................................................................................................6 Method ..............................................................................................................................7 Search and Selection Criteria ..................................................................................7 Procedure...
Explore
Instructional domain (subject)
- Languages (1)
- Literacy (1)
- Mathematics (1)
- Multiple
- Science (1)
- Social Studies (1)
Groups of students
- _No mention (2)
- At-risk (3)
- Learning difficulties (1)
- Low-performing (1)
- Low socio-economic status (1)
- SEND (1)
Moderating variables
- __ no obvious moderating variables (1)
- Assessments (1)
- Design-type/ testing instruments (1)
- Feedback (1)
- Grade/education level (4)
- Length of time (6)
- Multiple exposures (1)
- Novelty Effect (1)
- Peer involvement/group learning (1)
- Subject (4)
- Teacher involvement (4)
- Teacher pedagogy/implementation (1)
- Teacher professional development (2)
- Type of instruction methods (student/teacher centered) (2)
- Type of knowledge or task (exposing, procedural, active, etc (3)
Tech Hardware
- CD ROM/ DVD (1)
- Computer
- Handheld device (1)
- Infrastructure (1)
- Interactive whiteboards (1)
- Internet (1)
- Laptops (1)
- Tablet (1)
Tech Software
Tech mechanism
Learning Approach
Teacher Pedagogy
- _No mention (2)
- Collaboration (3)
- Feedback (2)
- Flipped classroom (1)
- Group learning (2)
- Individualised (1)
- Project-based learning (1)
Research methods
Effect size/ heterogeneity
HIC/LMIC
- HIC (high income) (3)
- LMIC (middle/low) (1)
- Mixture or unknown (4)
Quality of research
- High: 6+ (4)
- Low: 3 or below (1)
- Medium: 4 or above (3)
Geography if specific
- _no mention (1)
- Taiwan (1)
- Turkey (1)
- USA (1)