Your search
Results 29 resources
-
Background/Context Earlier research on various forms of distance learning concluded that these technologies do not differ significantly from regular classroom instruction in terms of learning outcomes. Now that web-based learning has emerged as a major trend in both K–12 and higher education, the relative efficacy of online and face-to-face instruction needs to be revisited. The increased capabilities of web-based applications and collaboration technologies and the rise of...
-
It is assumed that serious games influences learning in 2 ways, by changing cognitive processes and by affecting motivation. However, until now research has shown little evidence for these assumptions. We used meta-analytic techniques to investigate whether serious games are more effective in terms of learning and more motivating than conventional instruction methods (learning: k ϭ 77, N ϭ 5,547; motivation: k ϭ 31, N ϭ 2,216). Consistent with our hypotheses, serious games were found to be...
-
This paper examines the literature on computer games and serious games in regard to the potential positive impacts of gaming on users aged 14 years or above, especially with respect to learning, skill enhancement and engagement. Search terms identified 129 papers reporting empirical evidence about the impacts and outcomes of computer games and serious games with respect to learning and engagement and a multidimensional approach to categorizing games was developed. The findings revealed that...
-
A systematic search of the research literature from 1996 through July 2008 identified more than a thousand empirical studies of online learning. Analysts screened these studies to find those that (a) contrasted an online to a face-to-face condition, (b) measured student learning outcomes, (c) used a rigorous research design, and (d) provided adequate information to calculate an effect size. As a result of this screening, 50 independent effects were identified that could be subjected to...
-
Studies focusing on the effectiveness of computer-assisted instruction have been growing recently in Turkey. In this research, quantitative studies comparing the effectiveness of computer- assisted instruction to traditional teaching method and conducted between 1998 and 2007 are studied by meta analysis. Seventy eight studies that have eligible data were combined with meta analytical methods by coding protocol from the 422 master’s and doctoral degree and 124 articles. As a result for the...
-
A meta-analysis was performed to synthesize existing research comparing the effects of computerassisted instruction (CAI) versus traditional instruction (TI) on studentsÕ achievement in Taiwan. Fiftytwo studies were located from our sources, and their quantitative data was transformed into effect size (ES). The overall grand mean of the study-weighted ES for all 52 studies was 0.55. The results suggest that CAI is more effective than TI in Taiwan. In addition, two of the seventeen variables...
-
Substantial disagreement exists in the literature regarding which educational technology results in the highest cognitive gain for learners. In an attempt to resolve this dispute, we conducted a meta-analysis to decipher which teaching method, games and interactive simulations or traditional, truly dominates and under what circumstances. It was found that across people and situations, games and interactive simulations are more dominant for cognitive gain outcomes. However, consideration of...
-
Purpose of the Study.........................................................................................................6 Method ..............................................................................................................................7 Search and Selection Criteria ..................................................................................7 Procedure...
Explore
Outcome measure
- Behaviour (3)
- Engagement (2)
- Learning (29)
- Motivation (3)
- Qualification (1)
- Socio-emotional learning (1)
Instructional domain (subject)
- Computing (2)
- Languages (2)
- Literacy (4)
- Mathematics (8)
- Multiple
- Science (8)
- Social Studies (4)
- STEM (4)
Education Level and Type
- ECE 0-7 (1)
- High school 16-18 (5)
- Informal education (2)
- K-12 (19)
- Middle school (2)
- Primary 7-10 (6)
- Secondary 11-16 (8)
- Tertiary (15)
Groups of students
- _No mention (7)
- At-risk (4)
- EAL (1)
- Gifted students (1)
- Learning difficulties (1)
- Low-performing (1)
- Low socio-economic status (1)
- SEND (3)
- typically-developing students (1)
School or home
- _No mention (4)
- Home (2)
- Mixture (3)
- School (11)
Moderating variables
- __ no obvious moderating variables (3)
- Assessments (4)
- Class size (1)
- Country / culture (3)
- Design-type/ testing instruments (4)
- Feedback (2)
- Gender (1)
- Grade/education level (9)
- Length of time (14)
- Multiple exposures (4)
- Novelty Effect (3)
- Peer involvement/group learning (6)
- School-level factors (2)
- Student characteristics (4)
- Subject (8)
- Teacher involvement (7)
- Teacher pedagogy/implementation (3)
- Teacher professional development (3)
- Tech structure (6)
- Type of instruction methods (student/teacher centered) (5)
- Type of knowledge or task (exposing, procedural, active, etc (5)
Tech Hardware
- Assistive Devices for SEND (1)
- CD ROM/ DVD (1)
- Computer (15)
- E-book hardware - e.g. kindle (1)
- Handheld device (3)
- Infrastructure (2)
- Interactive whiteboards (3)
- Internet (2)
- Laptops (2)
- Mobile/Smartphone (3)
- Multimedia (1 or more) (10)
- Tablet (4)
Tech Software
- Audio books (1)
- Augmented Reality (2)
- Clicker-integrated instruction (1)
- Computer-Assisted Instruction (CAI) (8)
- Computer-Based Teaching (CBT) (7)
- Digital Media (audiovisuals) (2)
- E-book software (1)
- Game learning (11)
- General apps (5)
- Graphic organisers/Visualisations (2)
- Intelligent Tutoring (1)
- LMS (2)
- Serious games (3)
- Simulations (5)
- Tutorials (1)
- Virtual manipulatives (1)
- Virtual Reality (5)
Tech mechanism
- _No mention (3)
- Cooperative learning (e.g. discussion areas) (4)
- Direct instruction (1)
- Drill and practice (2)
- Feedback (10)
- Gamification (9)
- Graphic modelling (1)
- Instructional supports/Demos: worked out examples (5)
- Multimedia effects (2)
- Personalization effect (2)
- Research/Homework/Assignments (1)
- Scaffolding/Varying difficulty levels (5)
- Virtual pen and notetaking (1)
Learning Approach
- _No mention (4)
- Blended learning (4)
- Classroom learning (12)
- Remote learning (4)
Teacher Pedagogy
- _No mention (4)
- Collaboration (6)
- Feedback (4)
- Flipped classroom (1)
- Game-based learning (4)
- Group learning (7)
- Individualised (1)
- PC mixed with real objects (2)
- Peer learning (2)
- Project-based learning (1)
- Scaffolding (2)
- Self-paced (no teacher) (1)
Research methods
Effect size/ heterogeneity
HIC/LMIC
- HIC (high income) (8)
- LMIC (middle/low) (3)
- Mixture or unknown (14)
Quality of research
- High: 6+ (10)
- Low: 3 or below (2)
- Medium: 4 or above (14)