Your search
Results 25 resources
-
Different learning environments provide different learning experiences and ought to serve different achievement goals. We hypothesized that constructivist learning environments lead to the attainment of achievements that are consistent with the experiences that such settings provide and that more traditional settings lead to the attainments of other kinds of achievement in accordance with the experiences they provide. A meta-analytic study was carried out on 32 methodologically-appropriate...
-
Purpose of the Study.........................................................................................................6 Method ..............................................................................................................................7 Search and Selection Criteria ..................................................................................7 Procedure...
-
How effective are computer-assisted instruction (CAI) programs in supporting beginning readers? This article reviews 42 studies published from 1990 onward, comprising a total of 75 experimental comparisons. The corrected overall effect size estimate was d = 0.19 (± 0.06). Effect sizes were found to depend on two study characteristics: the effect size at the time of pre-testing and the language of instruction (English or other). These two variables accounted for 61 percent of the variability...
Explore
Outcome measure
- Attitudes (1)
- Behaviour (1)
- Learning (24)
- Motivation (1)
Instructional domain (subject)
- Computing (1)
- Languages (1)
- Literacy (10)
- Mathematics (6)
- Multiple (9)
- Science (2)
- Social Studies (1)
- STEM (2)
Education Level and Type
- ECE 0-7 (3)
- High school 16-18 (2)
- K-12 (17)
- Middle school (2)
- Primary 7-10 (6)
- Secondary 11-16 (4)
- Tertiary (4)
Groups of students
- _No mention (4)
- At-risk (4)
- EAL (3)
- Examination years (2)
- Learning difficulties (4)
- Low-performing (4)
- Low socio-economic status (6)
- SEND (4)
- typically-developing students (1)
Moderating variables
- __ no obvious moderating variables (3)
- Assessments (2)
- Attainment level of students (1)
- Country / culture (1)
- Design-type/ testing instruments (7)
- Ethnicity (1)
- Feedback (3)
- Gender (1)
- Grade/education level (8)
- Length of time (15)
- Multiple exposures (3)
- Novelty Effect (5)
- Parent/carer involvement (1)
- Peer involvement/group learning (4)
- School-level factors (1)
- SEND (2)
- Socio-economic status (1)
- Subject (5)
- Teacher involvement (10)
- Teacher pedagogy/implementation (3)
- Teacher professional development (2)
- Tech structure (1)
- Type of instruction methods (student/teacher centered) (5)
- Type of knowledge or task (exposing, procedural, active, etc (6)
Tech Hardware
- Computer (19)
- E-book hardware - e.g. kindle (2)
- Handheld device (4)
- Interactive whiteboards (2)
- Internet (2)
- Laptops (1)
- Mobile/Smartphone (1)
- Multimedia (1 or more) (6)
- Tablet (3)
- Touch-screen (2)
Tech Software
- Augmented Reality (1)
- Clicker-integrated instruction (1)
- Computer-Assisted Instruction (CAI) (12)
- Computer-Based Teaching (CBT) (6)
- Digital Media (audiovisuals) (4)
- Dynamic Geometry Software (1)
- E-book software (5)
- Game learning (1)
- General apps (5)
- Graphic organisers/Visualisations (4)
- Intelligent Tutoring (1)
- LMS (3)
- Simulations (3)
- Tutorials (1)
- Virtual manipulatives (2)
- Virtual Reality (1)
- Word processor (2)
Tech mechanism
- _No mention (5)
- Cooperative learning (e.g. discussion areas) (2)
- Direct instruction (1)
- Drill and practice (1)
- Feedback (10)
- Gamification (1)
- Graphic modelling (1)
- Instructional supports/Demos: worked out examples (7)
- Personalization effect (2)
- Research/Homework/Assignments (1)
- Scaffolding/Varying difficulty levels (7)
- Virtual pen and notetaking (1)
Learning Approach
Teacher Pedagogy
- _No mention (4)
- Collaboration (5)
- Feedback (3)
- Game-based learning (1)
- Group learning (6)
- Individualised (1)
- PC mixed with real objects (1)
- Peer learning (4)
- Project-based learning (1)
- Scaffolding (5)
Research methods
Effect size/ heterogeneity
HIC/LMIC
- HIC (high income) (9)
- LMIC (middle/low) (1)
- Mixture or unknown (17)
Quality of research
- High: 6+ (18)
- Low: 3 or below (1)
- Medium: 4 or above (6)