Your search
Results 7 resources
-
This article reports the results of a meta-analysis of technology-based intervention studies for children with autism spectrum disorders. We conducted a systematic review of research that used a pre–post design to assess innovative technology interventions, including computer programs, virtual reality, and robotics. The selected studies provided interventions via a desktop computer, interactive DVD, shared active surface, and virtual reality. None employed robotics. The results provide...
-
The present review examines research on the effects of educational technology applications on mathematics achievement in K-12 classrooms. Unlike previous reviews, this review applies consistent inclusion standards to focus on studies that met high methodological standards. In addition, methodological and substantive features of the studies are investigated to examine the relationship between educational technology applications and study features. A total of 74 qualified studies were included...
-
The purpose of this review is to learn from rigorous evaluations of alternative technology applications how features of using technology programs and characteristics of their evaluations affect reading outcomes for students in grades K-12. The review applies consistent inclusion standards to focus on studies that met high methodological standards. A total of 84 qualifying studies based on over 60,000 K-12 participants were included in the final analysis. Consistent with previous reviews of...
-
A systematic search of the research literature from 1996 through July 2008 identified more than a thousand empirical studies of online learning. Analysts screened these studies to find those that (a) contrasted an online to a face-to-face condition, (b) measured student learning outcomes, (c) used a rigorous research design, and (d) provided adequate information to calculate an effect size. As a result of this screening, 50 independent effects were identified that could be subjected to...
Explore
Outcome measure
- Behaviour (1)
- Learning (6)
- Socio-emotional learning (1)
Instructional domain (subject)
- Literacy (2)
- Mathematics (2)
- Multiple (2)
- Science (1)
Education Level and Type
- ECE 0-7 (1)
- Informal education (2)
- K-12 (6)
- Secondary 11-16 (1)
- Tertiary (4)
Groups of students
- EAL (2)
- Low socio-economic status (2)
- SEND (1)
School or home
- _No mention (1)
- School (4)
Moderating variables
- Country / culture (1)
- Design-type/ testing instruments (6)
- Ethnicity (1)
- Gender (1)
- Grade/education level (3)
- IQ (1)
- Length of time
- Novelty Effect (1)
- Peer involvement/group learning (1)
- School-level factors (1)
- SEND (1)
- Socio-economic status (1)
- Subject (1)
- Teacher involvement (3)
- Teacher pedagogy/implementation (1)
- Type of instruction methods (student/teacher centered) (1)
- Type of knowledge or task (exposing, procedural, active, etc (2)
Tech Hardware
- CD ROM/ DVD (1)
- Computer (6)
- Interactive whiteboards (1)
- Internet (1)
- Mobile/Smartphone (1)
- Multimedia (1 or more) (1)
- Tablet (1)
Tech Software
- Augmented Reality (1)
- Computer Algebra Systems (1)
- Computer-Assisted Instruction (CAI)
- Computer-Based Teaching (CBT) (2)
- Digital Media (audiovisuals) (1)
- E-book software (1)
- Game learning (1)
- General apps (3)
- Graphic organisers/Visualisations (1)
- LMS (3)
- Robotics (1)
- Virtual manipulatives (1)
- Virtual Reality (1)
Tech mechanism
Learning Approach
- Blended learning (3)
- Classroom learning (4)
- Remote learning (2)
Teacher Pedagogy
- _No mention (1)
- Collaboration (1)
- Group learning (1)
- PC mixed with real objects (1)
- Peer learning (1)
Research methods
Effect size/ heterogeneity
HIC/LMIC
- HIC (high income) (3)
- Mixture or unknown (6)