Your search
Results 17 resources
-
Previous empirical studies on the effect of scaffolding in game-based learning environments have shown inconsistent findings. In this study, we conducted a meta-analysis to examine the effect of scaffolding in digital game-based learning (DGBL) and to explore a range of moderating factors that may have contributed to the inconsistencies of primary studies. We used the three-level meta-analysis method to analyze the data for handling data non-dependency issues of multiple effect sizes in one...
-
This research aims to investigate the effect of computer-based teaching (CBT) on students’ academic success. The research used a meta-analytic method to reach a general conclusion by statistically calculating the results of a number of independent studies. In total, 78 studies (62 master’s theses, 4 PhD theses, and 12 articles) concerning this issue were researched based on the literature review of the articles and theses which involved pre-test and post-test control groups and were...
-
In this meta-analysis, we systematically reviewed research on digital games and learning for K–16 students. We synthesized comparisons of game versus nongame conditions (i.e., media comparisons) and comparisons of augmented games versus standard game designs (i.e., value-added comparisons). We used random-effects meta-regression models with robust variance estimates to summarize overall effects and explore potential moderator effects. Results from media comparisons indicated that digital...
-
In this meta-analysis, we investigated the effects of methods for providing item-based feedback in a computer-based environment on students’ learning outcomes. From 40 studies, 70 effect sizes were computed, which ranged from −0.78 to 2.29. A mixed model was used for the data analysis. The results show that elaborated feedback (EF; e.g., providing an explanation) produced larger effect sizes (0.49) than feedback regarding the correctness of the answer (KR; 0.05) or providing the correct...
-
This report presents an overview of the process and initial findings of a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature on computer simulations for K–12 science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) learning topics. Both quantitative and qualitative research studies on the effects of simulation in STEM were reviewed. Studies that reported effect size measures or the data to calculate effect sizes were included in the meta-analysis. Important moderating factors related to...
-
This article reports the results of a meta-analysis of technology-based intervention studies for children with autism spectrum disorders. We conducted a systematic review of research that used a pre–post design to assess innovative technology interventions, including computer programs, virtual reality, and robotics. The selected studies provided interventions via a desktop computer, interactive DVD, shared active surface, and virtual reality. None employed robotics. The results provide...
-
The purpose of this meta-analysis is to examine overall effect as well as the impact of selected instructional design principles in the context of virtual reality technology-based instruction (i.e. games, simulation, virtual worlds) in K-12 or higher education settings. A total of 13 studies (N ¼ 3081) in the category of games, 29 studies (N ¼ 2553) in the category of games, and 27 studies (N ¼ 2798) in the category of virtual worlds were meta-analyzed. The key inclusion criteria were that...
-
The present review examines research on the effects of educational technology applications on mathematics achievement in K-12 classrooms. Unlike previous reviews, this review applies consistent inclusion standards to focus on studies that met high methodological standards. In addition, methodological and substantive features of the studies are investigated to examine the relationship between educational technology applications and study features. A total of 74 qualified studies were included...
-
In this study, we meta-analyzed empirical research of the effectiveness of intelligent tutoring systems (ITS) on K–12 students’ mathematical learning. A total of 26 reports containing 34 independent samples met study inclusion criteria. The reports appeared between 1997 and 2010. The majority of included studies compared the effectiveness of ITS with that of regular classroom instruction. A few studies compared ITS with human tutoring or homework practices. Among the major findings are (a)...
-
The purpose of this review is to learn from rigorous evaluations of alternative technology applications how features of using technology programs and characteristics of their evaluations affect reading outcomes for students in grades K-12. The review applies consistent inclusion standards to focus on studies that met high methodological standards. A total of 84 qualifying studies based on over 60,000 K-12 participants were included in the final analysis. Consistent with previous reviews of...
-
A systematic search of the research literature from 1996 through July 2008 identified more than a thousand empirical studies of online learning. Analysts screened these studies to find those that (a) contrasted an online to a face-to-face condition, (b) measured student learning outcomes, (c) used a rigorous research design, and (d) provided adequate information to calculate an effect size. As a result of this screening, 50 independent effects were identified that could be subjected to...
-
A meta-analysis was performed to synthesize existing research comparing the effects of computerassisted instruction (CAI) versus traditional instruction (TI) on studentsÕ achievement in Taiwan. Fiftytwo studies were located from our sources, and their quantitative data was transformed into effect size (ES). The overall grand mean of the study-weighted ES for all 52 studies was 0.55. The results suggest that CAI is more effective than TI in Taiwan. In addition, two of the seventeen variables...
Explore
Outcome measure
- Attitudes (1)
- Behaviour (1)
- Learning (16)
- Socio-emotional learning (1)
Instructional domain (subject)
- Languages (1)
- Literacy (3)
- Mathematics (5)
- Multiple (9)
- Science (4)
- Social Studies (1)
- STEM (1)
Education Level and Type
- ECE 0-7 (1)
- High school 16-18 (1)
- Informal education (2)
- K-12 (15)
- Primary 7-10 (1)
- Secondary 11-16 (2)
- Tertiary (8)
Groups of students
- _No mention (3)
- At-risk (1)
- EAL (1)
- Learning difficulties (1)
- Low-performing (1)
- Low socio-economic status (3)
- SEND (2)
School or home
- _No mention (2)
- Home (1)
- Mixture (1)
- School (12)
Moderating variables
- Assessments (2)
- Attainment level of students (1)
- Design-type/ testing instruments (9)
- Ethnicity (1)
- Feedback (2)
- Gender (1)
- Grade/education level (8)
- IQ (1)
- Length of time
- Multiple exposures (1)
- Novelty Effect (1)
- Peer involvement/group learning (4)
- School-level factors (1)
- SEND (1)
- Socio-economic status (1)
- Student characteristics (2)
- Subject (5)
- Teacher involvement (7)
- Teacher pedagogy/implementation (1)
- Teacher professional development (1)
- Tech structure (3)
- Type of instruction methods (student/teacher centered) (5)
- Type of knowledge or task (exposing, procedural, active, etc (6)
Tech Hardware
- CD ROM/ DVD (1)
- Computer
- Internet (3)
- Laptops (1)
- Multimedia (1 or more) (4)
Tech Software
- Computer Algebra Systems (1)
- Computer-Assisted Instruction (CAI) (8)
- Computer-Based Teaching (CBT) (4)
- Digital Media (audiovisuals) (1)
- Game learning (4)
- General apps (2)
- Graphic organisers/Visualisations (3)
- Intelligent Tutoring (1)
- LMS (2)
- Robotics (1)
- Simulations (2)
- Virtual manipulatives (1)
- Virtual Reality (3)
Tech mechanism
Learning Approach
- _No mention (1)
- Blended learning (3)
- Classroom learning (12)
- Remote learning (3)
Teacher Pedagogy
- _No mention (3)
- Collaboration (4)
- Feedback (1)
- Game-based learning (1)
- Group learning (1)
- Individualised (1)
- Peer learning (2)
- Project-based learning (1)
- Scaffolding (3)
Research methods
Effect size/ heterogeneity
HIC/LMIC
- HIC (high income) (5)
- LMIC (middle/low) (1)
- Mixture or unknown (14)
Quality of research
- High: 6+ (14)
- Low: 3 or below (1)
- Medium: 4 or above (3)