Your search
Results 6 resources
-
In this meta-analysis, we systematically reviewed research on digital games and learning for K–16 students. We synthesized comparisons of game versus nongame conditions (i.e., media comparisons) and comparisons of augmented games versus standard game designs (i.e., value-added comparisons). We used random-effects meta-regression models with robust variance estimates to summarize overall effects and explore potential moderator effects. Results from media comparisons indicated that digital...
-
This report presents an overview of the process and initial findings of a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature on computer simulations for K–12 science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) learning topics. Both quantitative and qualitative research studies on the effects of simulation in STEM were reviewed. Studies that reported effect size measures or the data to calculate effect sizes were included in the meta-analysis. Important moderating factors related to...
-
A systematic search of the research literature from 1996 through July 2008 identified more than a thousand empirical studies of online learning. Analysts screened these studies to find those that (a) contrasted an online to a face-to-face condition, (b) measured student learning outcomes, (c) used a rigorous research design, and (d) provided adequate information to calculate an effect size. As a result of this screening, 50 independent effects were identified that could be subjected to...
Explore
Instructional domain (subject)
- Languages (1)
- Literacy (1)
- Mathematics (1)
- Multiple (5)
- Science (1)
- Social Studies (1)
- STEM (1)
Groups of students
- At-risk (1)
- EAL (1)
- Learning difficulties (1)
- Low socio-economic status (1)
- SEND (1)
School or home
- _No mention (2)
- Mixture (1)
- School (4)
Moderating variables
- Assessments (1)
- Country / culture (1)
- Design-type/ testing instruments (4)
- Feedback (1)
- Grade/education level (2)
- Length of time
- Multiple exposures (1)
- Novelty Effect (1)
- Peer involvement/group learning (3)
- School-level factors (1)
- Student characteristics (1)
- Subject (2)
- Teacher involvement (3)
- Teacher pedagogy/implementation (1)
- Tech structure (2)
- Type of instruction methods (student/teacher centered) (4)
- Type of knowledge or task (exposing, procedural, active, etc (2)
Tech Hardware
- Computer (5)
- Interactive whiteboards (1)
- Internet (1)
- Laptops (1)
- Mobile/Smartphone (1)
- Multimedia (1 or more) (1)
- Tablet (1)
Tech Software
Tech mechanism
- Cooperative learning (e.g. discussion areas) (3)
- Direct instruction (1)
- Drill and practice (1)
- Feedback (4)
- Gamification (1)
- Instructional supports/Demos: worked out examples (3)
- Multimedia effects (1)
- Research/Homework/Assignments (1)
- Scaffolding/Varying difficulty levels (3)
- Virtual pen and notetaking (1)
Learning Approach
- _No mention (1)
- Blended learning (2)
- Classroom learning (4)
- Remote learning (1)
Teacher Pedagogy
- Collaboration (4)
- Game-based learning (1)
- Group learning (2)
- Individualised (1)
- PC mixed with real objects (1)
- Peer learning (2)
- Project-based learning (1)
- Scaffolding (2)
Research methods
Effect size/ heterogeneity
HIC/LMIC
- HIC (high income) (2)
- Mixture or unknown (4)
Quality of research
- High: 6+ (4)
- Low: 3 or below (1)
- Medium: 4 or above (1)