Your search
Results 10 resources
-
Language abilities in the early years are a strong predictor of children’s success in school. However, a considerable number of children enter school with poor language skills. Therefore, one of the most important but also challenging mandates of early childhood education and care [ECEC] is to promote these skills before school enrolment. Meta-analytic evidence suggests that shared book reading is a valuable tool to narrow this gap in the early years. In the digital age, ebooks might offer...
-
Digital game-based learning (DGBL) is known to be widely used for improving learning in various fields. Among the elements of DGBL, competition has been very controversial. This meta-analysis, which included 25 articles written between 2008 and 2019, revealed that DGBL has produced improvements for learning outcomes with an overall effect size of .386. In addition, we explored multiple moderators to understand how competition in DGBL influenced student learning for different learners,...
-
Clickers, formerly known as instant response systems, have gradually become an integral part of the classroom. Though several reviews on research into clicker-integrated instruction have been published within this decade, the controversy over whether clickerintegrated instruction is effective to enhance students' learning gains has not been settled because the early reviews mainly focus on students' perceptions toward and acceptance of clicker-integrated instruction. Furthermore, so far...
-
It is assumed that serious games influences learning in 2 ways, by changing cognitive processes and by affecting motivation. However, until now research has shown little evidence for these assumptions. We used meta-analytic techniques to investigate whether serious games are more effective in terms of learning and more motivating than conventional instruction methods (learning: k ϭ 77, N ϭ 5,547; motivation: k ϭ 31, N ϭ 2,216). Consistent with our hypotheses, serious games were found to be...
-
Substantial disagreement exists in the literature regarding which educational technology results in the highest cognitive gain for learners. In an attempt to resolve this dispute, we conducted a meta-analysis to decipher which teaching method, games and interactive simulations or traditional, truly dominates and under what circumstances. It was found that across people and situations, games and interactive simulations are more dominant for cognitive gain outcomes. However, consideration of...
-
Purpose of the Study.........................................................................................................6 Method ..............................................................................................................................7 Search and Selection Criteria ..................................................................................7 Procedure...
-
How effective are computer-assisted instruction (CAI) programs in supporting beginning readers? This article reviews 42 studies published from 1990 onward, comprising a total of 75 experimental comparisons. The corrected overall effect size estimate was d = 0.19 (± 0.06). Effect sizes were found to depend on two study characteristics: the effect size at the time of pre-testing and the language of instruction (English or other). These two variables accounted for 61 percent of the variability...
-
This study quantitatively synthesized the empirical research on the effects of social context (i.e., small group versus individual learning) when students learn using computer technology. In total, 486 independent findings were extracted from 122 studies involving 11,317 learners. The results indicate that, on average, small group learning had significantly more positive effects than individual learning on student individual achievement (mean ES = + 0.15), group task performance (mean ES = +...
Explore
Outcome measure
- Behaviour (1)
- Learning (10)
- Motivation (1)
Instructional domain (subject)
- Computing (1)
- Languages (2)
- Literacy (3)
- Mathematics (3)
- Multiple (7)
- Science (3)
- Social Studies (2)
- STEM (1)
Education Level and Type
- ECE 0-7 (3)
- High school 16-18 (3)
- Informal education (1)
- K-12 (6)
- Middle school (1)
- Primary 7-10 (3)
- Secondary 11-16 (3)
- Tertiary (4)
Groups of students
- _No mention (2)
- At-risk (4)
- EAL (1)
- Low-performing (2)
- Low socio-economic status (1)
- SEND (1)
- typically-developing students (1)
School or home
- _No mention (2)
- Mixture (1)
- School (7)
Moderating variables
- __ no obvious moderating variables (2)
- Assessments (1)
- Country / culture (2)
- Design-type/ testing instruments (2)
- Feedback (1)
- Gender (1)
- Grade/education level (1)
- Length of time (4)
- Multiple exposures (3)
- Novelty Effect (2)
- Peer involvement/group learning (3)
- School-level factors (1)
- Student characteristics (1)
- Subject (2)
- Teacher involvement (2)
- Teacher pedagogy/implementation (1)
- Tech structure (1)
- Type of instruction methods (student/teacher centered) (2)
- Type of knowledge or task (exposing, procedural, active, etc (1)
Tech Hardware
- Computer (5)
- E-book hardware - e.g. kindle (1)
- Handheld device (1)
- Interactive whiteboards (2)
- Laptops (1)
- Mobile/Smartphone (1)
- Multimedia (1 or more) (4)
- Tablet (2)
- Touch-screen (1)
Tech Software
- Augmented Reality (1)
- Clicker-integrated instruction (1)
- Computer-Assisted Instruction (CAI) (4)
- Computer-Based Teaching (CBT) (3)
- Digital Media (audiovisuals) (1)
- E-book software (2)
- Game learning (2)
- General apps (2)
- Graphic organisers/Visualisations (1)
- LMS (1)
- Serious games (2)
- Simulations (2)
- Virtual manipulatives (1)
- Word processor (1)
Tech mechanism
Learning Approach
- _No mention (2)
- Blended learning (2)
- Classroom learning (6)
Teacher Pedagogy
- _No mention (1)
- Collaboration (2)
- Feedback (2)
- Game-based learning (2)
- Group learning
- Individualised (1)
- PC mixed with real objects (1)
- Peer learning (3)
- Project-based learning (1)
- Scaffolding (1)
Research methods
Effect size/ heterogeneity
HIC/LMIC
- HIC (high income) (4)
- Mixture or unknown (6)
Quality of research
- High: 6+ (6)
- Medium: 4 or above (5)